European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies


Health Systems in Transition (HiT) profile of Cyprus

3.4 Out of pocket payments

OOP payments represent over 83% of private health care expenditure, or nearly half of THE. Although OOP spending as a share of total private expenditure has declined since the 1990s, it remains at a very high level relative to other EU countries. During the same period, private health insurance rose considerably as a share of private expenditure, from 1.4% in 1995 to 9.4% in 2009 (Table3.1).

Household surveys conducted every six years by the Department of Statistics and Research in the MoF are an important source of data on OOP expenditures (Family Budget Surveys, 1999, 2006, 2011). According to these data the mean annual OOP expenditure for health services per adult equivalent 4 in the lowest income decile was €357 in 1996/97, €436 in 2003 and €608 in 2009. Among those in the highest income decile, the corresponding figures are €627, €1170 and €1749, respectively (Table3.2). Low-consumption and low-income households spend a higher proportion of their annual income and consumption on health compared to richer households, which reveals that the distribution of health expenditure is regressive.

The findings of a household survey from 2002 by the Harvard School of Public Health are similar (Hsiao & Jakab, 2003). The median household, reporting an annual income between £C9000 (€15 457) and £C11 000 (€18 892), was found to spend nearly 4% of its income on health care services. Those with an annual household income below the median level spent 4.6 – 6.4% of their income on health, while those above the median income level spent 2.6 – 3.0% of their household income on health (Fig3.6). Expenditure levels for households that spend a large share of their income on health are increasing steadily, indicating that households with chronic or severe acute illness may face catastrophic levels of health expenditure. The financial burden of health expenditures has increased more for lower income households than for those with a higher income.

The burden of OOP payments, especially for low- and middle-income households, is quite large. One possible explanation for such high OOP expenditures is that for reasons including long waiting lists, quality issues and health illiteracy, most people choose to purchase health care services from the private sector even though they are entitled to free access in the public sector.

4 The OECD scale counts the head of the household as 1.0 unit, additional adults (aged over 13) as 0.5 units and children (13 years of age and under) as 0.3 units. For example, a household of four of which two are aged 40 and 30 and the other two are aged 12 and 6 have an equivalent household size of 1+0.5+0.3+0.3=2.1.

3.4.1 User charges

Approximately 85% of the population has free or reduced rate access to public health care services; the rest of the population pays full rates set by the Ministry of Health. However, for those patients in beneficiary group “B” and non-beneficiaries who use the public sector for their health needs, user charges can be substantial (Table3.3). Data from the Ministry of Health show that the majority of non-beneficiaries choose the private sector for health care, as only a small amount of public revenues were raised in 2009 from payments by non-beneficiaries, amounting to barely 1.8% of total hospital expenditures (€6 million).

An interesting element of the fee schedule is the payment ceiling for hospital care, estimated as a percentage of annual income for every beneficiary, based on income level and the number of dependants. Expenditures beyond this ceiling must be paid out of the hospital budget. For example, the payment ceiling for a two-member family with €40 000 annual income is €2141. Table3.4 shows the income ranges, and the corresponding maximum percentage of annual income that can be spent on hospital care. This provision protects individuals from catastrophic levels of expenditure on inpatient care.

The cabinet, followed by the parliament, is responsible for approving user charges policies, setting prices and imposing user charges, based on proposals made by the Ministry of Health.

3.4.2 Direct payments

Theoretically, most medical services are covered and should be provided by the public sector to all beneficiaries in group “A”, except for some dental services such as orthodontics, fixed prosthetics and implants. For those services, patients must visit private dentists and pay out of pocket. In very few instances when for various reasons the public sector cannot provide a particular service, services can be purchased from the private sector. Direct payments are a common means of provider reimbursement for semi-state organizations and workers’ funds, as well as for many VHI schemes.

3.4.3 Informal payments

There is limited anecdotal evidence of informal payments in the public and private sectors. High physician salaries and very strict legislation generally prevent informal payments, although in some cases it may occur. For example, women who want to deliver their child in a public hospital with the gynaecologist or obstetrician of their choice usually offer a gift to their doctor.

As of August 2013, as a result of the MoU with the Troika, new regulations came into force regarding the public provision of health care services. Main changes are:

• Abolition of class B beneficiaries
• New criteria for the acquisition of the medical card
• Introduction of co-payments for beneficiaries as follow:
€10 for a visit to the Accident/Emergency Departments,
€3 for a visit to a GP,
€6 for a visit to a specialist and
€0.50 for each prescribed pharmaceutical product and laboratory test with a maximum charge of €10 per prescription.
Exceptions apply for certain vulnerable groups.